MCOA 336419, the PPO against Maria de la Merced Viggers

Note: More files to come, since the respondent has further abused MCL 600.2950a while the appellate review is pending.

Harassment leading to PPO against the respondent

• María Viggers' first harassing voicemail at my workplace.
• María Viggers' second harassing voicemail at my workplace.
• As part of her pattern of harassment (emails and phone calls), María  Viggers' renewedly attempts to get in touch with my former co-workers. It is hard for an employer not to be alarmed when a person of those characteristics (and living within 15 miles from my workplace) shows such signs of exasperation.

Trial Court

• May 1, 2015: Personal Protection Order 15-941-PH against respondent María de la Merced Viggers.
• My Motion to Show Cause (pending redacted upload).
• Respondent's Motion to Terminate PPO.
• My opposition to respondent's motion to Terminate PPO.
• December 8, 2016: Hearing transcript.
• December 15, 2016: Hearing  transcript, what really amounts to judge Timothy Connors' twisted parody of The Dr. Phil Show for matters of a non-domestic Personal Protection Order.

Michigan Court Of Appeals

• December 29, 2016: My Brief on Appeal.
• December 29, 2016: My Docketing Statement.
• March 30, 2017: My First Supplemental Authority Letter.
• May 14, 2017: Second Supplemental Authority Letter.
• July 6, 2017: My Motion for Relief Pursuant to MCR 7.216(A) (the COA denied my motion, as usual, without explaining 'why' in its one-line order).
• February 13, 2018: Third Supplemental Authority Letter.